AI governance committee exists? Yes — the RFP explicitly states "Vendors must complete the Logitech AI Approval process" for AI features. This directly impacts Opal inclusion.
Committee involvement required for this deal? Yes, if Opal is included. Requirements, timeline, and contacts are completely unknown as of 2026-03-11.
Strategy to avoid premature committee exposure: Position Opal as "experiment governance and quality assurance" rather than "AI agents." Lead with the platform deal (Feature Experimentation) and layer Opal in after the experimentation decision is made. If the AI Approval process is onerous, Opal could be a Phase 2 add-on rather than blocking the initial deal.
If unavoidable, key committee member to pre-brief: Eric Porres (CDO) likely owns AI governance, but Deepa blocks access. Discover the process through Siddhant or Deepa: "What does your AI Approval process involve? We want to get ahead of it." Must surface before 2026-03-27 close target.
Deepa presents recommendation to Jessica Vondrak (business sponsor) and Kevin Yip (budget). 2/24 POC readout with Jessica and Deepa completed — Siddhant presented acceptance criteria results, Peter Ten Eyck presented value analysis.
Peter Ten Eyck (SVC) prepared value analysis: $6.86M Year 1 / $26.74M over 3 years. Presented at 2/24 readout to Jessica and Deepa (per 3/4 review — Deepa now has visibility). Deepa must be prepared to take the $6.86M Year 1 projection and Salesforce proof point to Kevin Yip.
Next gate is commercial conversation and EB (Kevin Yip) engagement. Prepare Deepa to take the $6.86M Year 1 projection and Salesforce proof point (+78% experiments, +9% win rate) to Kevin Yip.